The collection

Every essay — page 16

One idea per essay, ordered so that the earlier ones set up the later ones — but nothing here depends on being read in sequence. Essays 301–320 of 514.

Galaxies

Where the unknown stops being a number and becomes a profile — and most of it is not light.

An arm that is undone by the work it does

A spiral pattern takes angular momentum from the inner disc and delivers it to the outer, which lets mass move inwards without violating anything. It is paid for in random motion, and a disc with too much random motion cannot carry a wave — so the pattern destroys the conditions it needs to exist.

8 figures · Spiral structure

The last parsec, priced in stars. The two timescales that shrink a pair of 10⁸-solar-mass black holes at the centre of a merged galaxy, against their separation in parsecs, both axes logarithmic, for a stellar velocity dispersion of 200 km/s and a central density of 500 solar masses per cubic parsec. Ejecting stars hardens the binary at a rate proportional to the separation, so that timescale grows as the orbit shrinks; gravitational radiation goes as the fourth power of the separation, so its timescale collapses. Neither alone finishes the job and the crossing of the two is where the answer is set. With the loss cone kept full, the crossing is at 2.9e-2 parsecs and the total is 4.2·10⁸ years, inside a Hubble time. With the supply of low-angular-momentum orbits emptied by a factor of 100 — which is what happens in a smooth spherical nucleus, because the stars that could interact have already been thrown out and two-body relaxation refills the orbits far too slowly — the crossing moves outward to 7.3e-2 parsecs and the total becomes 1.7·10¹⁰ years. That is the final-parsec problem, and it is not a problem about gravity: it is a problem about supply. Real nuclei are not spherical, and the figure cannot show what a triaxial potential does, which is to keep feeding the binary orbits it has not already used.

The last parsec, and the stars that are not there

Two galaxies merge and their central black holes sink towards each other, and then stop. From about a parsec apart, friction no longer works and gravitational radiation is not yet strong enough — and the only mechanism in between throws away the stars it depends on faster than they can be replaced.

8 figures · Galactic nuclei

Exoplanets

Planets nobody has seen, weighed and measured from a dip, a wobble and a delay.

A misalignment only cool stars forget

A third of hot Jupiters orbit at a large angle to their star's equator, and some go round backwards. Sort the same planets by the temperature of their host and the picture changes — below about 6,250 kelvin almost all are aligned, and above it almost none are. The boundary is not about the planets.

8 figures · Spin–orbit alignment

Gravitation

Two bodies pulling on each other, and everything that goes wrong at three.

A circular orbit has one lock, and an eccentric one has several. The strength of each spin–orbit resonance against orbital eccentricity, as the Hansen coefficient H(p, e) that multiplies the restoring torque on a permanently non-spherical body. At zero eccentricity every curve but the synchronous one is exactly zero — the figure checks that rather than showing it — so a body on a circular orbit can lock only by turning once per orbit. Away from zero the others switch on: at Mercury's eccentricity of 0.2056 the 3:2 resonance has 73 per cent of the synchronous one's strength and more than twice the 2:1's. A planet spinning down through this family therefore meets the 3:2 before the 1:1 and has a real chance of being caught there, which is what happened — Mercury turns three times for every two orbits, a fact discovered by radar in 1965 after a century of assuming it was locked. The free libration of that locked state follows from the same coefficient and the measured 2.03e-4 for (B − A)/C: 12.1 years, against a measured period near twelve. What the figure cannot show is the capture probability itself, which depends on how the tide dissipates and ranges from a few per cent for a simple constant-lag tide to more than half once friction between a liquid core and the mantle is included.

A rotation locked to the orbit, but not one to one

Mercury turns exactly three times for every two circuits of the Sun. That was not what anybody expected, and it is not an accident — on a circular orbit a tidally despun body has exactly one place to lock, and on an eccentric one it has several — with the strength of each set by a coefficient that vanishes when the eccentricity does.

8 figures · Resonance

The observed sky

Coordinates, seasons, phases and shadows — geometry seen from inside it.

A wobble that should have stopped

The Earth's rotation pole wanders across its own crust in a circle a few metres wide. A rigid Earth would do it in 305 days; it takes 433, and the difference is a measurement of the planet's elasticity. At the observed damping it should have died out within a human lifetime, and it has not.

9 figures · Precession

Stars

The diagram that sorted them, and the one quantity that decides a star's whole life.

A surface that slowed because the star grew

A star leaving the main sequence expands by a factor of a hundred. Conserve its angular momentum and its equator slows by four orders of magnitude, which is why every red giant is a slow rotator. One or two per cent are not, and a giant turning at fifty kilometres a second has to have been given the angular momentum by something else.

8 figures · Stellar evolution

A field that would have arrived ten thousand times too strong

A collapsing cloud carries its magnetic field with it, and the arithmetic of that is not negotiable — the field grows as the two-thirds power of the density. Run it from a diffuse cloud to a protostellar core and the answer is four orders of magnitude above anything measured on a young star.

10 figures · Flux freezing

The darkness a field pays for

A sunspot is not cool because something is missing. It is cool because a three-thousand-gauss field supplies part of the pressure that holds the column up, the gas therefore supplies less, and the level at which that gas becomes opaque sits some hundreds of kilometres deeper than the surface around it.

10 figures · Plasma beta

Starlight

Distance, brightness and colour: what can be measured when nothing can be visited.

$A slope, not an angle. Above: the polarisation angle of a background source against the square of the observing wavelength, at the five wavelengths a radio survey actually uses. The plane rotates as it passes through magnetised plasma, by an amount proportional to the integral of the electron density times the field along the path — and to λ². The intercept is the angle the source emitted at, which nobody knows, so a measurement at one wavelength contains no information whatever; the slope is the rotation measure, here 42 radians per square metre, and it needs no knowledge of the source at all. Below: the fractional polarisation that survives. A telescope beam covers many lines of sight with slightly different rotation measures, their angles disagree by more at longer wavelengths, and the vector sum collapses — which is why the useful band has a long-wavelength edge that has nothing to do with sensitivity. Divide the rotation measure by the dispersion measure of the same path, 26.8 in the usual units, and the electron density cancels: the mean line-of-sight field is 1.93 µG, obtained without knowing the distance, the density, or where along the path the field was.$

A slope that needs no source

Polarised light passing through magnetised plasma has its plane rotated, by an amount proportional to the square of the wavelength. A single measurement of the angle is worthless, because nobody knows the angle the source emitted at. A measurement of the slope against wavelength squared does not need to know.

10 figures · Faraday rotation

Gravitation

Two bodies pulling on each other, and everything that goes wrong at three.

A vanishing field that changes the answer completely. The growth rate of the magnetorotational instability against wavenumber, both in units the orbital frequency sets: the vertical axis is the growth rate divided by Ω, the horizontal is the wavenumber multiplied by the Alfvén speed and divided by Ω. The maximum is exactly three quarters of the orbital frequency and it does not depend on the field strength at all — it occurs at kv_A = √15Ω/4, so a weaker field simply moves the fastest-growing wavelength to a longer one. The curve vanishes above kv_A = √3Ω, which is the only thing the field decides: modes shorter than that are stabilised by magnetic tension. An unmagnetised Keplerian disc is Rayleigh-stable and would never accrete; a disc with a field a millionth of the strength needed to matter dynamically grows a mode that doubles in about a fifth of an orbit. The limit is discontinuous, which is the reason this was found late and by algebra rather than early and by observation.

The weakest field changes the answer

A Keplerian disc is stable by every hydrodynamic test there is. Add a magnetic field of any strength whatever — a millionth of what would matter dynamically — and it becomes violently unstable, at a growth rate of three quarters of an orbit per radian that does not depend on the field at all.

10 figures · Magnetorotational instability

The observed sky

Coordinates, seasons, phases and shadows — geometry seen from inside it.

A boundary that a sixty-fourfold gust moves by a factor of two. The standoff distance of a dipole magnetosphere against a wind, in planetary radii, against the wind's proton density, for three wind speeds. The boundary sits where magnetic pressure equals ram pressure — the only balance available, since the field exerts no force on neutral gas and the wind touches nothing. Because a dipole falls as the cube of distance its pressure falls as the sixth power, so the standoff goes as the ram pressure to the −1/6: at 450 km/s a density of 6 per cubic centimetre puts the nose at 9.3 radii — against a measured average of ten to eleven — and a sixty-fourfold compression moves it only to 4.7. That exponent is the reason a magnetosphere is a stable thing to have. It is also the reason the boundary's position is a poor measurement of the field: a factor of two in the distance is a factor of sixty-four in what caused it, so the standoff measures the wind badly and the planet's moment hardly at all.

A boundary that hardly moves

The magnetopause sits where the planet's magnetic pressure equals the solar wind's ram pressure. Because a dipole falls as the cube of distance, its pressure falls as the sixth power — so a sixty-fourfold gust in the wind moves the boundary by a factor of two, and a boundary that will not move is what makes a magnetosphere a stable thing to have.

10 figures · Magnetosphere

Spaceflight

Celestial mechanics used forwards — where to burn, and what it costs.

Three motions, three decades apart, and that is the point. The three periods of a trapped 1-MeV electron's motion against the shell it is trapped on, on a logarithmic time axis. It gyrates about a field line in 0.22 milliseconds, bounces between its mirror points in 0.33 seconds, and drifts right round the planet in 16 minutes — ratios of 1498 and 3015 at L = 4. Each motion carries a conserved quantity: the magnetic moment, the longitudinal invariant, and the magnetic flux the drift shell encloses. The separation is what makes them conserved. An invariant survives anything that changes slowly compared with its own period, so a disturbance lasting minutes destroys the third and leaves the first two untouched — and a particle that keeps its magnetic moment while being moved inward to a stronger field must gain energy. That is not a loophole; it is how the belts are filled.

Three clocks and nothing to fall onto

A charged particle in a dipole field gyrates, bounces and drifts, on timescales a millisecond, a second and a quarter of an hour. The three periods are three decades apart, and that separation is not a curiosity — it is the reason each motion has a conserved quantity, and the reason a magnetic storm can accelerate particles rather than merely stir them.

10 figures · Radiation belts

Galaxies

Where the unknown stops being a number and becomes a profile — and most of it is not light.

A field strength read off the scatter of directions. The Davis–Chandrasekhar–Fermi estimate: field strength against the dispersion of polarisation angles across a cloud, at a density of 10⁴ molecules per cubic centimetre and a turbulent velocity of 0.9 kilometres a second. The polarisation directions themselves contain no field strength — an aligned grain reports which way the field points and nothing about how hard it is pulling. The strength is in the disorder. Turbulence of a given energy bends a stiff field less than a weak one, so the angular scatter is the ratio of the turbulent velocity to the Alfvén speed, and inverting it gives the field: 220 µG at a 9-degree dispersion. The relation is exactly inverse, so the estimate is most trustworthy where the field is most ordered and worst where it matters most. The factor of 0.5 in front is not theory — it is what simulations of a known field, analysed this way, turn out to need, and the honest statement is that this method is calibrated rather than derived.

A direction measured by something with no strength in it

An interstellar grain spins with its long axis across the magnetic field, so starlight through a cloud is polarised along the field and the cloud's own emission across it. The observable contains no field strength whatever — and the strength is recovered anyway, from how much the directions disagree.

10 figures · Dust polarisation

The energy at which the sky begins to point. Gyroradius against energy for a singly charged particle, in three field strengths, with the thickness of the galactic disc and the size of its halo marked. A cosmic ray is not an image of anything: its path is a helix about a field line, and by the time it arrives the direction it came from has been erased. The erasure is quantitative. At 3 µG a proton's gyroradius equals the disc's half-thickness at 4.2·10¹⁷ electronvolts and the halo's radius at 4.2·10¹⁹, so below the first the particle is stored and stirred for tens of millions of years, and only above the second does it travel in something like a straight line. The measured spectrum has a break — the knee — at about 3×10¹⁵ eV, which is within a factor of a few of the first of those; the sky only starts showing structure above 10¹⁹, which is the second. Two features of a spectrum measured on the ground, both located by one straight line on this plot.

The energy at which a sky begins to point

A cosmic ray arrives from a direction that has nothing to do with where it came from. Its path is a helix about a galactic field line, and only above the energy at which that helix is bigger than the galaxy does the arrival direction start to mean anything — which is one particle per square kilometre per century.

10 figures · Cosmic rays

Cosmology

One object, seen once, from inside — and every number in it the output of a model.

Thirty e-foldings erase the memory of a seed. Field strength against time for three seed fields 8 orders of magnitude apart, amplified at one e-folding every 3·10⁸ years — a galactic dynamo's measured turnover rate — and stopped at the 3·10⁻⁶ gauss the disc actually has. In 10 billion years the budget is 33 e-foldings, which is a factor of 3·10¹⁴. That is the finding: the three tracks reach the same ceiling within 5.5 billion years of one another, so the field a galaxy has today carries essentially no information about the field it started with. Any seed above about 10⁻²⁰ gauss will do, and mechanisms that produce far less than that are the only ones ruled out. The measurement that does constrain a seed has to be made where no dynamo ever ran, which means the voids between clusters — and the limit there comes from gamma rays that never arrived.

The seed that cannot be remembered

A galactic dynamo affords something like thirty e-foldings over the age of a galaxy, which multiplies any seed field above a ten-thousandth of a billionth of a microgauss up to the microgauss actually observed. The field a galaxy has today therefore says nothing about the field it started with, and the only place a seed survives unamplified is the emptiness between clusters.

10 figures · Primordial fields

Starlight

Distance, brightness and colour: what can be measured when nothing can be visited.

The field nobody measured, and the reason the number is quoted anyway. The energy content of a radio source against the field strength assumed for it, both logarithmic. A synchrotron luminosity constrains only the product of the relativistic electron content and the field: a bright source can be many particles in a weak field or few in a strong one, and no observation of the radiation distinguishes them. The two curves are the two costs. Assuming a weak field is expensive in particles, because the particle energy needed rises as the field to the minus three halves; assuming a strong one is expensive in the field itself, which rises as B². Their sum has a minimum at 5.0e-5 gauss, and at that minimum the particle energy is exactly four thirds of the field energy — which is where the word equipartition comes from, and it is a property of where a curve turns rather than a statement about nature. The estimate is quoted because it is robust: the minimum-energy field goes as luminosity to the two sevenths, so an order of magnitude of ignorance about the luminosity is a factor of 1.93 in the answer. It is also, for the same reason, nearly uninformative — a number that hardly moves is a number that hardly measures.

A minimum that was mistaken for a principle

A radio source's brightness fixes the product of its particle content and its field, and nothing about the radiation separates them. What is quoted instead is the field that makes the total energy least — and at that field the particles happen to carry four thirds of what the field does, which is where the word equipartition comes from and why it is not a physical assumption at all.

10 figures · Synchrotron radiation

Two effects that are blind in opposite directions. The sensitivity of two magnetic diagnostics against field strength, on a logarithmic axis spanning five decades. The Zeeman effect measures the line-of-sight component and adds it up along the path, so a field tangled into 100 independent cells inside one resolution element averages down by a factor of 10 and reports almost nothing — which is exactly the situation in a chromosphere or a turbulent cloud. The Hanle effect is a different device altogether: a field precesses the atom between absorption and re-emission, so a scattering line's polarisation is rotated and reduced, and the amount depends on how far the precession gets in one radiative lifetime. That makes it sensitive around 1 gauss for a 100-nanosecond level, and — the useful part — it does not care about sign, so a tangled field does not cancel. Above the crossing at 27.7 gauss the Hanle signal has saturated and carries no strength information, and the Zeeman effect is the instrument. Neither is a measurement of the field; each is a measurement of what the field did to something else.

Two instruments blind in opposite directions

The Zeeman effect measures the component of a field along the line of sight and adds it up, so a field tangled into a hundred cells reports a tenth of one cell's strength. The Hanle effect measures how far an atom precesses between absorbing and re-emitting, does not care about sign, and saturates just where the Zeeman effect becomes useful.

9 figures · Polarimetry

Stars

The diagram that sorted them, and the one quantity that decides a star's whole life.

One step of memory, and it is kept at the poles. Two predictors of a solar cycle's amplitude, each tested against the seven cycles for which both quantities exist, with amplitudes scaled so that cycle 21 is one. Left: the polar field measured at the minimum before the cycle begins, which correlates with what follows at r = 1.00. Right: the amplitude of the previous maximum, which correlates at r = 0.34 — that is, not at all. The cycle is therefore not a pendulum with momentum; it is a process with exactly one state variable, and the variable is the poloidal field that the decay of the previous cycle's spots leaves behind at high latitude. That is the observational core of the flux-transport picture: spots emerge tilted, their trailing polarity drifts poleward, and what accumulates there is the seed the next cycle's shear will wind up. It is also the only prediction in solar physics with a lead time of years, and it was what said, correctly and unpopularly, that cycle 24 would be the weakest in a century.

One step of memory kept at the poles

The amplitude of a solar maximum tells almost nothing about the next one. The polar field measured at the minimum in between tells a great deal — so the cycle is not a pendulum with momentum but a process with exactly one state variable, and the variable is a field of a few gauss at latitudes nobody can see well.

10 figures · Solar cycle

The observed sky

Coordinates, seasons, phases and shadows — geometry seen from inside it.

The flare that arrives from somewhere else

The solar wind blows radially outward and the Sun rotates, so the field frozen into the wind is wound into a spiral making forty-five degrees to the radius at the Earth. Energetic particles follow the field rather than the line of sight, which is why the flares that deliver particle storms are the ones on the western limb rather than the ones facing the planet.

10 figures · Stellar winds

Stars

The diagram that sorted them, and the one quantity that decides a star's whole life.

A formula everyone uses, and the number no pulsar has. Above: the braking index measured for the 4 pulsars whose spin-down has been followed long enough to give a second derivative, against the value a magnetic dipole rotating in vacuum requires. That value is exactly 3, and it is what every catalogued field strength and every characteristic age assumes. Not one measurement reaches it: they run from 1.4 to 2.839, and all of them fall short in the same direction, which is the signature of a systematic rather than of noise. Below: what that costs. The age a spin-down history gives is the period divided by (n − 1) times its derivative, so the ratio to the quoted characteristic age is 2/(n − 1) — 5.00 for Vela. The numbers are not thereby useless: an exponent recovered from the data is exactly the kind of correction a measurement can absorb. What has gone is the claim that the field strength printed beside a pulsar is a measurement of a field. It is a measurement of a spin-down rate, read through a model the same pulsar refutes.

The exponent no pulsar has

Every field strength in the pulsar catalogue comes from one formula, which assumes the star is a magnetic dipole rotating in a vacuum and therefore that its spin-down obeys an exponent of exactly three. Where that exponent has been measured it is 2.51, 2.84, 1.4 — never three, and always short.

9 figures · Pulsars

Every sequence · Every named object · Search