Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Dwarf galaxy — where it appears

A galaxy of low luminosity and low mass, typically below a billion solar masses in stars. The gas-rich ones are dominated by dark matter at every radius, which is why they are where the inner shape of a halo is argued about.

Named by 3 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Three mass models, 2.3× apart in the disc, agreeing to 3.1 km/s everywhere. NGC 3198's rotation curve, decomposed three ways. The stellar disc has been scaled by 0.2, 0.65, 1.1 times its photometric mass, and for each scaling the halo's asymptotic speed and core radius have been fitted — not chosen — to reproduce the same total. The heavy curve and the marked points are that total: the three models agree with it to 3.08 km/s at every radius, well inside a measurement error of 4.5. The light curves below are the disc's own contribution, and at 17 kpc they differ by a factor of 2.3 — from 36 to 85 km/s — with the halo taking up exactly the slack, 126 down to 97. The curve is one function and the decomposition asks for two. The free parameter is the mass-to-light ratio of the stars, which the kinematics never measures, and it is why a "maximum disc" fit and a halo-dominated fit are both published for the same galaxy. The degeneracy does have one hard edge: scaling the disc to 1.35 times its photometric mass cannot be fitted by any halo in the family — the best leaves 5.6 km/s rms — because past the maximum-disc solution the stars alone already overshoot the curve and a halo cannot have negative mass. That is the one thing a rotation curve says about M/L on its own, and it is an upper limit. What separates the rest has to come from somewhere else: the vertical velocity dispersion of the disc, which weighs the stars alone; gas-rich dwarfs where there is scarcely a disc to argue about; or the baryonic Tully–Fisher relation, which ties the halo's speed to the baryons and would be a coincidence if the two were independent.

The same curve, two galaxies

A rotation curve is one function of radius. Decomposing it asks for two — how much of the speed is the stars and how much is the halo — and the mass-to-light ratio that trades one against the other is not measured by anything in the kinematics. A maximum disc and a halo-dominated fit run through identical points.

galaxies · Rotation curves A cusp and a core in the same halo: 39 times apart in density, 2.34 in rotation. Two dark-matter density profiles for a halo of 10¹⁰ solar masses, drawn on logarithmic axes so a power law is a straight line and its exponent is a slope. The upper curve is the profile cold dark matter simulations produce: density rising inward without limit, with a logarithmic slope tending to -1.01 — a cusp. It is not a fit to observations; it emerges from simulations run by many groups with different codes, and its robustness is what makes it a prediction worth testing. The lower curve is a cored profile with the same virial mass, flat inside a kiloparsec, slope -0.01. What the rotation curves of gas-rich dwarf galaxies prefer is the second. The disagreement is stark where it is drawn — a factor of 39 in density at 0.10 kiloparsecs — and much less stark in what is actually measured, because a rotation speed depends on the mass enclosed rather than on the local density, and integrating a cusp over a small radius does not accumulate very much. At 1 kiloparsecs the two halos differ by a factor of 2.34 in circular speed — a real difference, and a far smaller one than the 39 in density that produced it. That compression is the whole difficulty of the problem. The observable is an integral of the quantity in dispute; integrating a cusp over a small radius does not accumulate much mass, so the sharpest disagreement lives where the instrument is bluntest. And the innermost points of a rotation curve are also the ones most affected by non-circular motions, by beam smearing, and by the inclination assumed — so the measurement is hardest exactly where it matters most. Whether the resolution is astrophysical — supernova feedback moving gas repeatedly and dragging the dark matter outward with it — or a statement about what dark matter is remains open, and the figure deliberately shows only the alternatives rather than choosing.

An argument about the innermost kiloparsec

Simulations of cold dark matter have produced the same halo for thirty years — a density rising inward without limit. The rotation curves of the smallest galaxies say the density flattens off. The disagreement is confined to a region a thousandth of the halo's size, and it has not been settled.

galaxies · Halo profiles The same count, taken in two places. The ratio of a cluster's luminosity function to the field's, per galaxy at the knee, against absolute magnitude. Both are Schechter functions — the field at a faint-end slope of -1.25 and a characteristic magnitude of -20.9, the cluster at -1.05 and -21.4 — and they are normalised to agree at -21 so that what is drawn is a difference of SHAPE rather than of density, a cluster being some 240 times denser than the field by construction. Two things differ. The cluster's faint end is shallower: at -15 it holds 0.22 of the field's dwarfs per bright galaxy. And its knee is 0.5 magnitudes brighter, which is a factor of 1.6 in luminosity. Neither difference can be read as a cause. A cluster's galaxies are also redder, and the same photometry measures both — so a shallower faint end could mean that dwarfs were destroyed, or that they were never made, or that they are still there and have faded below the survey's limit because their star formation was stopped. The count says the populations differ; it does not say which of a galaxy's life stages the difference happened in.

The same census, taken in two places

Fit a Schechter function to a rich cluster and to the field around it and the two come back with different slopes and different knees. Both differences are real, and neither can be read as a cause — a cluster's galaxies are also redder, and the same photometry measures both.

galaxies · Luminosity function

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

The baryonic Tully–Fisher relationBeam smearingCharacteristic luminosityCompletenessThe core–cusp problemCusp core problemDark matterDegeneracyThe disc–halo degeneracyEnclosed massFaint end slopeGalaxy cluster

All concepts