Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Equilibrium temperature — where it appears

The temperature at which a body re-radiates as much energy as it absorbs from its star, falling as the inverse square root of distance. It ignores greenhouse warming and internal heat, so it is a reference point rather than a surface temperature.

Named by 7 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The habitable zone, and the radius inside which a day never ends. The conservative habitable zone — the runaway-greenhouse and maximum-greenhouse limits of Kopparapu's parameterisation — as a band in stellar mass against orbital distance, both logarithmic. For the Sun it runs from 0.99 to 1.71 AU, which is the published result and the check on the arithmetic here. The band moves inward far faster than the mass falls, because luminosity goes as roughly the fourth power of mass: a 0.2 M☉ star's zone is at 0.082–0.158 AU. The dashed line is the distance inside which a planet is tidally locked within 4.5 billion years, computed from τ = ω₀αmQa⁶/(3GM⋆²k₂R³) with an initial ten-hour spin, Q = 100 and k₂ = 0.3. It crosses the inner edge of the zone at 0.67 M☉ — so around every star below that, which is the great majority of stars, a planet in the habitable zone has one hemisphere in permanent daylight. The Earth is outside its own locking radius of 0.53 AU, and TRAPPIST-1e at 0.029 AU is inside its star's by a factor of 8.

One number sets the zone

The habitable zone is a band of stellar flux, so it scales as the square root of luminosity and moves inward far faster than mass falls. For most stars it lies inside the radius at which a planet is tidally locked.

exoplanets · Habitable zone The ice line at 2.7 AU, and the 3.4-fold jump in solid material across it. Two temperature thresholds turned into radii, against stellar mass, both axes logarithmic. The shaded band is the habitable zone, where water can be liquid on a planet's surface. The heavy line is the snow line of the disc the planets formed in — the distance at which a passively heated disc, whose temperature falls as the inverse square root of radius, reaches 170 K and water freezes. For a solar-luminosity star it sits at 2.71 AU, just outside the asteroid belt, and it is 1.6 times further out than the outer edge of the habitable zone; around a 0.15 solar-mass star both have moved inwards and the ratio is 5.5. What makes the line matter is what happens as it is crossed. Water is by far the most abundant condensable material after hydrogen and helium, so freezing it raises the surface density of solids by roughly 3.4 times in one step. Everything about the architecture of a planetary system follows from that step: a core massive enough to capture gas can be assembled outside the line and not inside it, which is why the solar system has small rocky planets in and giant ones out, and why a giant planet found at 0.05 AU is a statement about migration rather than about formation. The line is drawn where a mature disc puts it; a young, accreting disc is hotter and its line is several times further out, sweeping inwards as the disc drains.

The line beyond which ice counts as rock

A disc of gas around a young star gets colder outwards, and at about a hundred and seventy kelvin water stops being vapour and becomes a building material. Crossing that one line multiplies the solid mass available by roughly three and a half, in a single step, and the architecture of every planetary system is downstream of it.

exoplanets · The snow line The inflation threshold at 2·10⁵ W m⁻², and the 0.69 R_J above it. Radius against the starlight received, for a population of Jupiter-mass planets. The horizontal line is what a structural model gives for a cold, old, Jupiter-mass ball of hydrogen and helium: 1.06 Jupiter radii, and it hardly depends on mass at all in this range, because degeneracy is beginning to set in and the mass–radius relation is flattening toward its turnover. Planets receiving less than about 2·10⁵ watts per square metre sit on that line, with a median of 1.06, which is the control the rest of the figure depends on: the models are not wrong in general. Above the threshold the radii climb, reaching a median of 1.75 — half again the size a cold planet of the same mass can be — and the onset is sharp enough to be called a threshold rather than a trend. Starlight by itself will not do this. Irradiation is absorbed high in the atmosphere and re-emitted from there; it slows the escape of heat from below, which delays contraction, but it cannot deposit energy beneath the radiative–convective boundary, and it is the interior entropy that sets the radius. So the excess is evidence for a mechanism that carries roughly half a per cent of the incident flux down to pressures of tens of bars — ohmic dissipation of currents driven through a partly ionised atmosphere, breaking gravity waves, and tidally forced turbulence are the candidates, and the threshold is the number each of them has to reproduce. The points are a synthetic population from a seeded generator, not a catalogue; what is real is the threshold, the size of the excess, and the fact that the un-irradiated planets sit exactly where they should.

A radius no cold planet is allowed

A Jupiter-mass ball of hydrogen has a maximum size, and it is about 1.06 Jupiter radii however old or young it is. Hundreds of hot Jupiters are half again that, and the excess switches on sharply above a threshold in the starlight they receive — which means something is putting energy in deep.

exoplanets · Planet composition The solid mass available, as a staircase of 5 fronts. The share of the condensable material that is solid, against distance from a 1 solar-mass star, on a logarithmic radius axis. Each riser is one species freezing out, at the radius where the disc's temperature — falling as the inverse square root of the distance — reaches that species' condensation point. silicates and iron at 1400 K and 0.04 AU; water ice at 170 K and 2.71 AU; carbon dioxide at 70 K and 16.00 AU; methane and ammonia at 30 K and 87.11 AU; carbon monoxide at 20 K and 196.00 AU. Inside every front the solid surface density is 22 per cent of what is available, which is the refractories alone; water alone contributes 53 per cent, more than twice everything else combined, which is why one of these steps is called the snow line and the others are not. A body's composition is decided by which pair of risers it formed between, and the steps are narrow because a vapour pressure is exponential in the inverse temperature.

There is not one line, there is a staircase

Water freezing is the biggest step in a protoplanetary disc and it is one of five. Each condensable species has its own temperature and therefore its own radius, and what a body is made of is decided not by which side of a line it formed on but by which pair of risers it formed between.

exoplanets · The snow line The ice line sweeps from 6.4 to 2.7 AU while the disc drains. The radius at which a disc around a 1 solar-mass star reaches 170 K, against the disc's age, both axes logarithmic. The temperature is the fourth root of the sum of two fluxes: starlight, which does not change, and the disc's own accretion, which releases gravitational energy at a rate set by how fast material is flowing inward. The accretion rate decays as the disc drains — taken here as 5e-5 solar masses a year falling off as t^(−3/2) beyond 0.1 million years — so the viscous term fades and the line sweeps in. It starts at 6.38 AU and ends at 2.73, the passive value the closed form gives. A body at three astronomical units formed dry if it formed early and icy if it formed late, so a composition dates a formation rather than locating one, and the dating is only as good as the accretion history assumed.

A composition that dates a formation rather than placing it

The ice line in a young disc starts six astronomical units out and sweeps inward to under three as the disc drains. A body at four astronomical units therefore formed dry or wet depending only on when — so what it is made of is a clock, and reading it as a map is the mistake the moving line makes easy.

exoplanets · The snow line A thermostat that passes 40 per cent of the change it is meant to cancel. Surface temperature against the flux a planet absorbs, in units of the Earth's, for a planet round a 1 M☉ star, with and without the carbonate–silicate cycle. With carbon dioxide held at 280 µbar the temperature follows the flux directly. With weathering allowed to adjust — rock dissolves faster when it is warm and when there is more CO₂, and in the steady state it must remove exactly what volcanoes supply at 1 times today's rate — a colder planet accumulates CO₂ until the balance is restored. The feedback is real and it is not a set point. Near S = 1 it passes 40 per cent of a flux change through to the surface: the loop gain is k s / β = 1.49, with weathering rising one e-fold for every 9.7 K, a greenhouse of 4.33 K per e-folding of CO₂ and a CO₂ exponent of 0.3. The required CO₂ would reach 8.8 bar — the point at which more of it scatters sunlight faster than it traps heat, and the controller has nothing left to add — at S = 0.249. The steady state reaches 273 K at S = 0.531, before the CO₂ has run out — the outer edge of this planet's habitable zone is where the thermostat saturates or freezes, whichever comes first. The climate law is logarithmic in CO₂, which is right near today's values and only a calibration at several bar; ice-albedo feedback, which makes a cooling planet able to jump to a frozen state, is left out.

A thermostat that only halves the error

The carbonate–silicate cycle is credited with keeping a planet's water liquid across the whole width of its habitable zone. Written down with its own measured exponents, it is a proportional controller that cancels about three-fifths of a change in sunlight, takes half a million years to do it — and reaches the published outer edge only on a planet with an order of magnitude more volcanism than the Earth.

exoplanets · Habitable zone An eccentricity of 0.4 swings the surface by 126 K or by 0.1, depending on the length of the year. The peak-to-trough swing in surface temperature over one orbit, against orbital period, for a planet with eccentricity 0.4 receiving on average the flux the Earth does, for surface layers of 1, 10, 50 metres of water. The dashed line is the 126 K the surface would swing through with no heat capacity. Every curve rises from near zero at short periods, where the orbit is over before the layer can respond and the planet feels only the average flux, towards the full swing at long periods, where every part of the orbit lasts long enough to be felt in full. The crossover is where the orbital period is comparable with the layer's thermal time. The vertical marks are the orbital periods of the Earth-flux orbit round stars of 0.1 M☉ (7 days), 0.5 M☉ (0.2 years), 1 M☉ (0.9 years). At a fixed eccentricity a planet in the habitable zone of a small star is thermally averaging almost regardless of how much water it has, and one round a Sun-like star is not unless it has an ocean — the ordering is set by the star through the period, which is the one quantity the flux-averaged habitable zone discards.

A year too short to feel its own eccentricity

A planet on an eccentric orbit can have a comfortable average and murderous extremes, and the habitable zone is drawn from the average. Whether the surface lives on the average or on the extremes is not decided by the flux at all — it is the ratio of how long the surface takes to change temperature to how long the year lasts, and the star sets the year.

exoplanets · Habitable zone

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Condensation sequenceDisc evolutionHabitable zonePlanetesimalProtoplanetary discThe snow lineInsolationM dwarfRunaway greenhouseSolid surface densityVolatile deliveryAccretion rate

All concepts