Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Interferometry — where it appears

Combining light collected at two or more separated apertures, so that the resolution is set by their separation rather than by any one of them. What each pair measures is one Fourier component of the sky, so an image comes from an incompletely sampled transform plane rather than from a focal plane.

Named by 9 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Resolution stops improving at 10 cm of aperture. Angular resolution against aperture at 500 nm, both logarithmic. The falling line is diffraction alone, 1.03 λ/D, which is what a telescope in vacuum delivers and has no floor. The curve is the same telescope under an atmosphere of Fried parameter r₀ = 10 cm, combining diffraction and seeing in quadrature: it follows the diffraction line while D < r₀ and then bends onto a plateau at 0.98 λ/r₀ = 1.01″. An amateur's 100 mm at 0.1 m would resolve 1.062″ above the air and delivers 1.47″ through it; a metre at 1 m would resolve 0.106″ above the air and delivers 1.02″ through it; the VLT at 8.2 m would resolve 0.013″ above the air and delivers 1.01″ through it; the ELT at 39 m would resolve 0.003″ above the air and delivers 1.01″ through it. At 39 m the atmosphere is costing a factor of 371: the aperture is 390 coherence lengths across and every one of the 152,100 patches it collects arrives with a phase of its own. What the extra aperture still buys is photons and speckles, and those two are what adaptive optics and speckle interferometry respectively spend to get the falling line back.

A ten-metre mirror that resolves like a ten-centimetre one

The atmosphere delivers a wavefront in patches about ten centimetres across, and an aperture larger than a patch collects patches rather than detail. Resolution stops improving at that size — and what the extra aperture keeps buying is photons and speckles, which is why there are two entirely different ways out.

sky · Seeing Fringe visibility for a 47 mas disc at 575 nm. Fringe visibility against the separation of the two apertures, for a disc 47 milliarcseconds across seen at 575 nm. The solid curve is a uniform disc, |2J₁(x)/x| with x = πθB/λ; it is exactly one at zero baseline, where both apertures see the same wavefront, and falls to zero at 3.08 m — read off the drawn samples, and equal to 1.21967 λ/θ to better than one part in a million. That is the measurement: not a brightness, a baseline. The dashed curve is the same disc with linear limb darkening u = 0.4, whose null is 4.9% further out at 3.23 m — so the same observed null implies 47 mas as a uniform disc and 49.3 mas limb-darkened, and a diameter quoted without its model is a number without a unit. At the 2.54 m aperture of the telescope this was done on, the visibility is still 0.17: one mirror cannot reach the null, which is the same statement as saying it cannot resolve the star.

An angle of five hundredths of an arcsecond

No telescope has ever resolved a star other than the Sun, and stellar diameters are measured anyway — by finding the separation of two apertures at which the star's interference fringes vanish. What that returns is an angle; the radius arrives only when a distance is brought in, and the distance is the worse-known half.

starlight · Angular diameter A star 1.24 times wider than it is tall, and 19 per cent brighter pole-on. Left, the meridional section of a star rotating at ω = 0.9257 of its critical angular velocity, computed from the Roche potential rather than sketched: the equator sits at 1.245 polar radii, and at the critical rate that ratio is exactly 1.5 whatever the star is made of. The same rotation expressed as a fraction of the critical equatorial speed is 0.768, and the two conventions differ by the distortion itself — a figure that prints one under the other's name is wrong by an amount that looks like rounding. Effective gravity at the equator is 0.329 of its polar value, so von Zeipel's flux law makes the pole hotter than the equator by a factor 1.320 at the theoretical exponent 0.25 and 1.232 at the 0.188 that interferometric imaging actually fits. Right, the apparent bolometric brightness against viewing inclination, integrated over the visible gravity-darkened surface: pole-on the star is 1.19 times brighter than edge-on, and the apparent temperature falls with it. The consequence is that a rapid rotator's place on the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram is partly a statement about the observer's position, which no spectrum taken alone can undo.

A temperature that depends on where the observer stands

A star turning near its break-up rate is half again as wide as it is tall, and its equator is thousands of degrees cooler than its poles. Neither of those is a small correction to a spectrum — the effective temperature and the luminosity such a star appears to have are partly statements about which way its axis happens to point.

starlight · Gravity darkening A source that erases its own polarisation. The polarised fraction of a uniform slab that both emits and Faraday-rotates, relative to its intrinsic value, against wavelength, for total Faraday depths of 10, 40, 150 rad m⁻². Light from the back of the slab is rotated by the whole depth and light from the front by none, so the polarisation vectors from different depths fan out and cancel. The fraction falls as |sin(Φλ²)/(Φλ²)| and vanishes altogether at λ² = π/Φ — 56.0 cm for 10, 28.0 cm for 40, 14.5 cm for 150 — then returns weakly and vanishes again. A source measured only at wavelengths beyond its first null looks unpolarised, and a source measured across the null shows a polarised fraction that depends on the wavelength in a way no foreground screen can produce. The shape of the fall is a measurement of how the rotating plasma is arranged along the line of sight.

A source that rotates its own light

The rotation-measure method assumes the plasma that turns the polarisation sits in front of the source. When it is mixed into the source instead, light from the far side is turned more than light from the near side, the contributions cancel, and the straight line in wavelength squared bends, halves its slope and then vanishes. The cure is to stop measuring in wavelength at all.

starlight · Faraday rotation A Cepheid's velocity, radius and angular size through two pulsation cycles. Three curves for a model Cepheid with δ Cephei's period of 5.37 days and a mean radius of 44 solar radii, at 272 parsecs, through two cycles. Top: the radial velocity of its spectral lines, in km/s, oscillating about the star's own velocity of -16.8 km/s — negative is towards the observer, so the surface is expanding when the curve is lowest. Middle: the change in radius, from integrating that velocity over time and multiplying by the projection factor p = 1.3: a swing of 4.9 solar radii, 11 per cent of the star. Bottom: the angular diameter the same star presents, in milliarcseconds, swinging by 168 microarcseconds about 1.505. The middle and bottom curves have the same shape because they are the same motion — one in kilometres, one in angle — and their ratio is the distance.

A distance that rests on one unmeasured number

A pulsating star's swelling can be measured twice — in kilometres from the Doppler shift of its lines, and in milliarcseconds by an interferometer — and the ratio is its distance, with no calibration against any other star. Except one: the factor that turns a line's velocity into the speed of the surface, which geometry puts at 1.33 to 1.5, measurement puts at 1.2 to 1.35, and every distance carries in proportion.

stars · Variable stars A colour that predicts an angle. The surface-brightness parameter Fᵥ — a combination of the V magnitude and the angular diameter that depends only on how bright each unit of the star's surface is — against the colour V − K, the ratio of the star's light at 0.55 and 2.2 microns. The line is the relation log θ = 0.5175 + 0.2753 (V − K) − 0.2 V, fitted to interferometric diameters of dwarfs and subgiants: Fᵥ = 3.962 − 0.1376 (V − K). The dots are 40 calibrating stars drawn about it with a 1 per cent scatter in angular diameter, the precision of a good interferometric measurement; refitting them returns a slope of −0.1374 and a scatter of 0.0023 in Fᵥ, which is 1.1 per cent in angle. The dashed curve is what blackbodies of 3,500 to 9,000 K would give, pinned to the Sun: it departs from the stars' line by up to 0.035 over the calibrated range, because real atmospheres have molecular bands and limb darkening a blackbody lacks — which is why the relation is calibrated on measured stars rather than derived. Given a star's V and V − K, the line returns its angular diameter without resolving it.

An angle too small to measure, read from a colour

A giant star in the Large Magellanic Cloud subtends two microarcseconds, a hundred times below anything an interferometer resolves. Its angle is read instead from its colour, through a relation calibrated on nearby stars that can be resolved — and because dust dims a star and reddens it by amounts that nearly cancel in that relation, the distance it gives hardly depends on the dust at all.

starlight · Angular diameter How steeply the ratio of all the light to one band rises with temperature. The exponent n in (bolometric flux ÷ band flux) ∝ Tⁿ, for a blackbody, against temperature, for bands at V (0.55 µm), J (1.25 µm), H (1.65 µm), K (2.2 µm). The bolometric flux rises as T⁴; the flux in a band rises as T on the long-wavelength side of the Planck peak and much faster on the short side, so n is the difference. For the Sun's temperature it is 2.33 in K, 1.70 in J and −0.56 in V. An error of one per cent in the modelled band flux becomes an error of 1/n per cent in the temperature: 0.43 per cent, 25 K, in K. In the visible the ratio barely depends on temperature and carries no information about it; in the infrared it does, and the temperature is read with its model error divided.

A temperature read against the light's long tail

A star's total light depends on its temperature to the fourth power; its light in the infrared depends on it barely more than linearly, because the infrared lies on the long, flat tail of the Planck curve. The ratio of the two cancels the star's size and distance and leaves a steep function of temperature — and the only model it needs is the infrared surface flux, whose errors are divided by two and a half on the way to the answer. That is the infrared flux method, one of the two foundations of the stellar temperature scale, and the other foundation disagrees with it by up to a hundred and fifty kelvin.

starlight · Stellar colour What a hundred kelvin moves, for a star like the Sun. The change in eight quantities derived for a Sun-like star and its planet when every temperature is raised by 100 K — 1.7% — as the uncertainty in the absolute temperature scale allows, against the precision each is quoted to (grey bars). The star's radius from its flux and parallax falls by 3.4%, because radius goes as the inverse square of temperature; the planet's radius follows, and its density rises by +12.8%. The oscillation-based mass rises by +2.6%, the main-sequence mass by +3.5% and the age falls by 9.8%. The iron abundance read from neutral iron lines rises by 0.08 dex, +20.7%. In every case the shift is comparable to or larger than the precision quoted, and in every case it moves all stars of a sample together.

A hundred kelvin under every radius

The temperatures of cool stars are quoted to tens of kelvin, and the scale they are all measured on is uncertain by about a hundred. That hundred is under almost everything else: a star's radius moves by twice its fractional error, a transiting planet's density by six times, a main-sequence age by ten per cent and an iron abundance by a fifth. And because a scale error moves every star of a sample the same way, no amount of averaging removes it.

starlight · Stellar colour The visibility precision a one-per-cent diameter needs. The precision in fringe visibility needed to measure a uniform disc's angular diameter to 1%, on the best baseline up to 330 m, against the diameter, at three wavelengths. Below the resolution limit the required precision falls as the square of the diameter. Even at its best, a visibility measures a diameter only about as precisely as it is itself measured, so a one-per-cent diameter needs visibilities better than a per cent. The shaded band, one to three per cent, is what a single calibrated visibility typically achieves; averaging ten or more measurements brings the effective precision to a few tenths of a per cent (dotted). At 0.3% the limit is about 0.13 mas in the visible, 0.19 mas in the red and 0.38 mas in the near-infrared H band, where most stellar diameters have been measured.

A diameter smaller than the fringes can see

The surface-brightness method gives distances good to a per cent for binaries of cool giants, and loses that precision for the hot stars that dominate other galaxies' bright binaries. The repair is an empirical calibration from the angular diameters of nearby hot stars — and those diameters are a few tenths of a milliarcsecond, below what the longest optical baselines comfortably resolve. A diameter measured at the edge of resolution is a small departure from perfect fringe contrast, and it costs visibility precision as the square of how small the star is.

starlight · Angular diameter

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Angular diameterEffective temperatureLimb darkeningStellar radiusDiffraction limitSurface brightnessAdaptive opticsAngular resolutionAsteroseismologyAtmospheric turbulenceB starsBaade wesselink method

All concepts