Magnetic flux — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
A field that would have arrived ten thousand times too strong
A collapsing cloud carries its magnetic field with it, and the arithmetic of that is not negotiable — the field grows as the two-thirds power of the density. Run it from a diffuse cloud to a protostellar core and the answer is four orders of magnitude above anything measured on a young star.
The same flux in three sizes
A few per cent of hot main-sequence stars carry kilogauss fields that do not change over decades. So do a similar share of white dwarfs, at a million times the strength, and of young neutron stars, at a hundred billion times it. Multiply each field by its star's area and the three classes carry nearly the same magnetic flux — what a field frozen into a star would keep as the star shrank by a factor of a hundred thousand. A collapse makes a field enormous, but it cannot make it important.
A field the turbulence will not let in
A disc that accretes through its own turbulence drags its magnetic field inward, and the same eddies let the field slip back out almost as fast. A disc of ordinary thickness bends its field by a few degrees instead of the thirty a wind needs, so a turbulent disc cannot gather the flux that would let it stop being turbulent.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Flux freezingMagnetic reynolds numberAmbipolar diffusionAngular momentum transportAp starsCosmic raysDead zoneDisc windFossil fieldInduction equationIonisationMagnetar