Magnetic reynolds number — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
A field that would have arrived ten thousand times too strong
A collapsing cloud carries its magnetic field with it, and the arithmetic of that is not negotiable — the field grows as the two-thirds power of the density. Run it from a diffuse cloud to a protostellar core and the answer is four orders of magnitude above anything measured on a young star.
The same flux in three sizes
A few per cent of hot main-sequence stars carry kilogauss fields that do not change over decades. So do a similar share of white dwarfs, at a million times the strength, and of young neutron stars, at a hundred billion times it. Multiply each field by its star's area and the three classes carry nearly the same magnetic flux — what a field frozen into a star would keep as the star shrank by a factor of a hundred thousand. A collapse makes a field enormous, but it cannot make it important.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Flux freezingMagnetic fluxAmbipolar diffusionAp starsCosmic raysFossil fieldInduction equationIonisationMagnetarMass-to-flux ratioMolecular cloudsStar formation