Reduced mass — where it appears
Named by 4 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The third law is wrong by the mass of the planet
Kepler's harmonic law says the square of the period goes as the cube of the size. Newton's version has one more term in it, and the term is the orbiting body's own mass — negligible for a planet, decisive for a binary star, and the reason a period can be converted into a mass at all.
Neither body is still, and the wobble is how planets are found
A planet does not orbit its star. Both orbit a point between them, and the star's share of that motion is small, measurable, and the reason thousands of planets are known.
Two bodies replaced by one that does not exist
The two-body problem is solved by turning it into a one-body problem about a fixed centre. The substitution is not an approximation — it is exact, and the body it invents has a mass no object in the system has.
One number where two masses were
The hundreds of orbits an inspiralling binary completes inside a detector's band depend on its two masses only through one combination of them. Every pair on that contour radiates an identical sweep, so the early signal — which carries nearly all the signal-to-noise — cannot say which pair it was.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Mass ratioBarycentreBinary starsEccentricityAngular momentumAstrometryCentral forceChirp massDegeneracyDetector sensitivity curveDynamical massGreat inequality