Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Restricted three-body problem — where it appears

Two masses on circular orbits about their common centre, and a third of negligible mass moving in the field they make. It is the simplest system that is not integrable, and its one conserved quantity — the Jacobi constant — is what bounds where the third body can go.

Named by 9 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Zero-velocity curves, mass fraction 0.15. Level sets of the Jacobi constant in the frame that rotates with the two bodies. A particle with a given value of C is confined to the side of its own curve where the kinetic energy would be positive; as C falls the curves open, first at the inner point between the bodies, then behind the smaller one, and finally around the whole system.

The curve that says where a body cannot go

The restricted three-body problem has no solution and one conserved quantity. That quantity is enough to draw a boundary the body can never cross — without integrating anything, without knowing where it started, and for all time.

gravitation · The three-body problem The surface a star stops at. The equipotential through L₁ — the Roche lobe — at mass fractions 0.50, 0.20, 0.05, in the frame that rotates with the pair. Each is a level set of exactly the same function the zero-velocity curves are level sets of, at exactly the critical value, so nothing here is a new construction: the Roche lobe is the last closed equipotential, and it is closed only because the two lobes touch at a single point. Material that reaches that point is no longer bound to the star it came from, and it leaves through an opening of zero area. The lobes are drawn in the orbital plane; in three dimensions each is a teardrop, and its volume-equivalent radius is what "the size of a Roche lobe" means. As the mass ratio becomes extreme the smaller star's lobe shrinks towards it, which is why a white dwarf accreting from a companion has a lobe smaller than the Sun.

The surface a star stops at

Around each star of a close pair there is a last closed equipotential, and the two touch at a single point. A star that swells to reach it hands its outer layers to its companion through an opening of zero area — and the transfer, once started, makes itself worse.

gravitation · Lagrange points The contours a planetary encounter cannot cross. Contours of the Tisserand parameter with respect to Jupiter in the plane of semi-major axis and eccentricity, drawn for a coplanar orbit. An encounter with Jupiter moves a comet along one of these curves and never across one, because T is what the encounter conserves. The heavy contours are at T = 3 and T = 2, and they are the boundaries the comet families are defined by: T > 3 means no encounter is possible at all, since v∞²/v_J² = 3 − T and a negative squared speed is not a trajectory; 2 < T < 3 is the Jupiter family; below 2 the approach speed exceeds Jupiter's own orbital speed and the orbits are the nearly isotropic ones. The shaded boundary is the crossing condition — an orbit whose pericentre is outside Jupiter's, or whose apocentre is inside it, never meets the planet whatever its T. The five comets are placed at their JPL elements and labelled with the T the literature quotes; all five with inclination sit off the coplanar contours by exactly the cos i in the definition, which is why 1P/Halley's is negative — a retrograde orbit meets Jupiter at nearly twice Jupiter's speed.

The number that survives the encounter

A comet that passes Jupiter comes away with every orbital element changed. One combination of them is not changed, and it is enough to recognise the comet afterwards, to sort the comet families, and to say where a spacecraft can and cannot go.

gravitation · Tisserand parameter An invariant that moves by 8.0e-3 once the planet's orbit is real. The Tisserand parameter of a comet on an orbit of semi-major axis 5 and eccentricity 0.8, followed through a close passage of Jupiter, integrated twice. The lower trace has Jupiter on a perfect circle, which is the problem the parameter is an exact constant of: it survives the encounter having moved by 1.0e-4, which is the integrator's own error and not a physical change, and the spike at the moment of closest approach is the osculating elements being briefly meaningless while the comet is inside Jupiter's sphere of influence rather than the constant failing. The upper trace is the same encounter with Jupiter on its real orbit, eccentricity 0.0489. The parameter comes out changed by 8.0e-3, 79 times as much, because the Jacobi constant exists only when the rotating frame is uniformly rotating and a planet on an ellipse does not provide one. That number is small and it is not negligible: comet families are separated by boundaries in this parameter placed to two decimal places, and a comet that drifts across one over several encounters has changed class without anything having happened to it that a single encounter could account for.

An invariant that is only almost one

The Tisserand parameter survives a close encounter with Jupiter exactly, and comet families are separated by boundaries in it drawn to two decimal places. The exactness holds for a Jupiter on a circle. Jupiter's eccentricity is 0.0489, and integrating the same encounter twice shows what that costs.

orbits · Tisserand parameter How fast an error in the departure grows, near a neck and on a conic. How much a small error in a spacecraft's velocity is magnified in its later position — the largest singular value of the block of the state-transition matrix that maps velocity errors to position errors, in the Earth–Moon system's units — against time in days, integrated from the variational equations of the restricted three-body problem. A trajectory held at the L1 point between the two bodies (blue) amplifies errors exponentially, by a factor of e every 1.48 days — the rate the linearised dynamics there predict, 2.932 in the system's units, which the integration reproduces to within two per cent. A two-body circular orbit at half the separation (green), integrated the same way with the second body's mass switched off, amplifies them only secularly — an error in speed is an error in period, and that grows along the track in proportion to time. Over 14 days the neck has multiplied an error by 2,359; the conic by 9.

A trajectory with no good first guess

A trajectory designed from conics is corrected onto the real one by Newton's method, and the method works because the arrival depends on the departure only polynomially. Near a Lagrange point the dependence is exponential: every day and a half near the Earth–Moon neck multiplies an error by e. The first guess has to be exponentially good, the digits of the departure run out in weeks, and the only cure is to stop treating the trajectory as one piece.

spaceflight · Patched conics An arrival held without a burn, and released. A body approaching a planet from a heliocentric orbit just outside the planet's, drawn in the planet's rotating frame (the Sun far to the left, the planet's orbital motion upward), in units in which the Hill radius is 0.69. It drifts in along the shear of the differential rotation, passes through the neck at the Lagrange point L2 into the region the planet controls, loops round the planet 3.3 times and leaves through a neck again. No burn is drawn: the capture and the release are both the Sun's tide working against the planet's pull. For Mars one unit of distance is 1.56 million km and an orbit round the planet near the Hill radius takes about a year.

An arrival the Sun hands over

A spacecraft that reaches a planet with no speed to spare can be captured with no burn at all, passing through the neck between the planet's gravity and the Sun's into a loose, looping orbit. The capture is temporary and chaotic — a few revolutions, and arrivals a few hundred kilometres apart end differently — but while it lasts the spacecraft is already bound, and the burn that keeps it is taken from there.

spaceflight · Escape A loop round the Earth that the Earth does not make. The path over one year, in the frame that turns with the Earth (Earth at the centre, the Sun far to the left, the Earth's motion upward), of bodies on heliocentric orbits with the Earth's period and eccentricities of 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, started at the Earth's mean longitude. Each traces a retrograde loop round the Earth, about 2ae long in the direction of motion and ae wide towards the Sun: for e = 0.1, 0.395 by 0.199 AU. The small circle is the Earth's Hill sphere, 0.010 AU in radius, inside which the Earth's gravity dominates the Sun's tide. Every loop lies far outside it. The loop is a difference between two ellipses with one period, and would be traced the same way if the Earth had no mass at all.

A moon the Earth does not hold

Seen from the Earth, the small asteroid Kamoʻoalewa circles the planet once a year, backwards, between forty and a hundred times as far away as the Moon. It is not a moon. It orbits the Sun, with the Earth's period and a slightly different eccentricity, and the loop is the difference between two ellipses — one the Earth would trace even with no mass at all. What the Earth's gravity does is subtler: it keeps the loop from drifting away.

gravitation · Lagrange points One orbit, chosen to spell 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 5. The height of the particle on the axis of an equal-mass binary of eccentricity 0.3, from launch at phase 210° and speed 1.3105, found by a seeded nested search for the sequence of excursions 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 5, in whole binary periods. Between each pair of crossings the particle's excursion lasts the listed number of periods, to the nearest whole one. Moser's theorem is about every sequence of large enough integers at small enough eccentricity and is exact; this is one finite word at one finite eccentricity, found numerically to show the kind of thing the theorem says exists.

A particle on a line that can spell any word

Two equal stars orbit each other, and a speck of dust moves up and down on the line through their centre, perpendicular to their orbit. It has one coordinate and cannot leave that line. In 1973 Jürgen Moser proved that for almost any list of whole numbers, as long as they are large enough, there is an orbit whose successive excursions last exactly that many periods of the stars. The list can be chosen at random, so the orbit can do anything a coin can.

gravitation · Chaos An outward path and a return path that cross, seen from a frame turning with the Moon. A trajectory in the Earth–Moon restricted three-body problem, in the frame rotating with the Moon. It leaves a 185 km parking orbit at 10.95 km/s, passes 716 km behind the Moon 3.0 days later, and returns to a perigee of -9 km without an engine firing, 6.0 days after departure. The crossing of the two legs is why it is called a figure of eight. The Moon's pull turns the direction of travel, and in a stationary frame the Earth is a much weaker influence on the far side; neither fact alone makes the geometry close. The Earth and Moon are at true scale.

A way home that needs no engine

A spacecraft can leave the Earth so that the Moon's gravity turns it round and sends it home with no further burn. Drawn in the frame that turns with the Moon the path is a figure of eight. It was flown to the Moon by every early Apollo mission for one reason: if the engine fails, the crew comes back. That safety is exquisitely narrow. A tenth of a metre a second at departure moves the perilune by tens of kilometres and the return by thousands, and the perilune it allows is not one that most landing sites can use.

spaceflight · Patched conics

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Jacobi constantLagrange pointsHill sphereRotating frameTisserand parameterGravity assistHyperbolic excess speedMass transferOsculating elementsRoche lobeAccretionAlgol paradox

All concepts