Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Rossby number — where it appears

The ratio of a star's rotation period to the turnover time of its convection. It measures how strongly rotation organises convection, and stellar magnetic activity and spin-down are both organised by it rather than by period alone.

Named by 3 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

A period, a colour, and an age. Rotation period against colour for stars of 125, 625, 1000, 2500, 4570 million years, under the empirical relation P = t^0.5189 × 0.7725(B−V − 0.4)^0.601. The isochrones do not cross and are separated at every colour by exactly the age ratio raised to 0.5189, which is what allows a single measured period to be inverted for an age once the colour is known. The Sun, at B−V = 0.653 and 4570 million years, is placed by the relation at 26.8 days against the 25.4 days it is observed to have. Three clusters are marked at a common colour to show the spacing directly. The dashed boundary at the left is where the Rossby number — the period divided by the convective turnover time — passes 2 on the oldest isochrone, at B−V = 1.35: past that point the braking weakens and the relation is known to over-predict the age, which is the one place a rotation period stops being a clock. What the figure cannot show is the scatter, which is a few days at fixed colour and age and is the real error bar on any single star.

The clock that starts by forgetting

An ordinary star tells nothing about its age. It sits on the main sequence for billions of years at almost fixed brightness and colour, and the one property that changes monotonically is how fast it turns — but only because the braking law destroys the initial condition first, and only until it stops.

stars · Magnetic braking In a mixed field the torque follows the dipole and ignores the rest. The torque of a field that is part dipole and part quadrupole, with the total surface strength fixed, as a fraction of a pure dipole's, against the fraction of the field strength in the dipole, for wind magnetisations of 300, 3,000, 30,000, using the broken power law fitted to simulated mixed-field winds. Above a dipole fraction of 0.39, 0.24, 0.15 respectively, the torque is exactly what the dipole component alone would give: the quadrupole has fallen below the dipole long before the wind reaches its Alfvén radius, and contributes nothing to the lever. Below it, the quadrupole sets a floor. A star whose surface is mostly quadrupole by strength can therefore be braked almost entirely by its small dipole — and a measurement of the total field says little about the torque unless it says how much of the field is dipolar.

A lever set by the dipole and not the field

A star's wind carries away its spin because the magnetic field holds the gas in step with the surface out to the Alfvén radius, and the torque goes as the square of that radius. How far out the field can hold depends less on how strong it is than on how it is arranged: a quadrupole of the same surface strength holds the Sun's wind to half the distance and brakes it at a fifth of the rate. In a mixed field only the dipole reaches far enough to matter — so the field that brakes a star is the part of it that is hardest to measure.

stars · Magnetic braking X-ray activity against Rossby number, with and without a tachocline. The X-ray luminosity of a star as a fraction of its total, against its Rossby number — the rotation period divided by the convective turnover time — for a synthetic sample of 600 stars of 0.4 to 1.2 solar masses, which have a radiative core and a tachocline below their convection zones, and 220 of 0.1 to 0.35 solar masses, which are convective to the centre and have neither. Both are drawn from one relation: saturated at a ratio of 10⁻³·¹³ below a Rossby number of 0.13 and falling as its −2.7th power above, with 0.25 dex of scatter. The saturated stars of the two kinds average −3.09 and −3.16 in the logarithm; 56 of the fully convective stars rotate slowly enough to lie on the unsaturated branch. This is the shape the measured relation has: the stars with no tachocline lie on the same line as those with one, saturated at the same level and falling along the same slope.

A dynamo that did not need the shear layer

The Sun's magnetic cycle has long been placed in the thin layer of shear beneath its convection zone, where a rigidly rotating interior meets a differentially rotating envelope. Stars below about a third of a solar mass have no such layer — they are convective to the centre — and they are as magnetically active as the Sun, saturate at the same level, and fade with slowing rotation along the same line. The saturation is the cleaner half of that evidence, because the slope depends on a turnover time that was itself calibrated from activity.

stars · Internal rotation

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Convective turnover timeGyrochronologyMagnetic brakingWeakened magnetic brakingActivity saturationAlfven radiusAngular momentumAsteroseismologyCalibrationConvective envelopeDifferential rotationDynamo

All concepts