Space-weather — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The flare that arrives from somewhere else
The solar wind blows radially outward and the Sun rotates, so the field frozen into the wind is wound into a spiral making forty-five degrees to the radius at the Earth. Energetic particles follow the field rather than the line of sight, which is why the flares that deliver particle storms are the ones on the western limb rather than the ones facing the planet.
A density model wrong by a factor of two
Everything about a low orbit's future depends on the density of the air at four hundred kilometres, and that density varies by a factor of twenty-five over the solar cycle, by two within a day, and by tens of per cent during a storm nobody predicted. Every model of it is an empirical fit, and re-entry dates are quoted with the honesty that implies.
A weather forecast made out of orbits
A density model fitted to fifty years of satellite drag is a climatology, and its error does not shrink with more data. Updating it from the drag observed on objects in orbit right now is the manoeuvre a weather forecast makes — and it buys a factor of several for a day and nothing at all for a fortnight.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Empirical modelRe-entry predictionSystematic errorThermospheric densityAlfven radiusAlong-track errorBallistic coefficientConjunction assessmentCorotating interaction regionCosmic raysData assimilationDrag coefficient