Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Stellar rotation — where it appears

How fast a star turns, measured from the broadening of its lines or from the brightness modulation its spots produce. It is the slowest-changing thing about a main-sequence star, which is what makes it usable as a clock.

Named by 7 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

A 27.5 m/s velocity the star does not have. Left: a rotating stellar disc, approaching on one side and receding on the other, with the chord a planet of 0.1 stellar radii takes across it at impact parameter 0.5 and a sky-projected obliquity of 0°. Right: the apparent radial velocity that results, computed by covering the disc cell by cell — the flux hidden at each phase and its mean line-of-sight velocity — rather than from a fitted formula. The star's centre of mass does not move at any point in this: the anomaly is entirely a statement about which parts of the line profile are missing. Its amplitude is 27.5 m/s at v sin i = 4.5 km/s, and the two numbers are related by the depth of the transit, since blocking a fraction f of light of mean velocity v shifts a flux-weighted centroid by f·v. The curve is antisymmetric about mid-transit to 0.00% of its own amplitude, which is what an aligned transit gives: equal time on the blue half and the red. Limb darkening is included at u = 0.6, and it matters: it weights the hidden light towards the centre of the disc, where the rotation velocity is smallest.

A velocity measured from a shape

A transiting planet hides part of a rotating disc, so the star's line profile loses a slice at one velocity and its fitted centroid moves. The star has not moved at all — and the lopsidedness of that motion is the whole measurement of whether the orbit lies in the star's own equatorial plane.

exoplanets · Spin–orbit alignment A hundredfold expansion is a four-order slowdown. Equatorial rotation speed against radius for three stars leaving the main sequence at 2, 10, 100 km/s, on the single assumption that nothing exerts a torque. Both axes are logarithmic. The specific angular momentum is held fixed along each track and checked at four radii rather than assumed, so the speed falls as the reciprocal of the radius and then faster, as the moment of inertia coefficient slides from 0.073 on the main sequence to 0.02 in a centrally condensed giant envelope. A star at 100 km/s crosses the 8 km/s line — the usual boundary for calling a giant a rapid rotator — at 45.6 solar radii, and everything larger is slower. That is why the observed giants are almost all under two kilometres a second, and why the one or two per cent that are not cannot be explained by anything the star did on its own: the angular momentum has to have been delivered, by a swallowed companion or a merger. The figure assumes no mass loss, which for the largest radii drawn is the weakest of its assumptions.

A surface that slowed because the star grew

A star leaving the main sequence expands by a factor of a hundred. Conserve its angular momentum and its equator slows by four orders of magnitude, which is why every red giant is a slow rotator. One or two per cent are not, and a giant turning at fifty kilometres a second has to have been given the angular momentum by something else.

stars · Stellar evolution A bump that crosses the line from -41 to 25 km/s. The residual of a rotationally broadened line profile during a transit, drawn at five epochs and offset vertically. The planet covers a strip of the stellar disc whose radial velocity is the projected rotation at that position, so it removes light from one velocity and leaves a bump in the residual there. As the planet crosses, the bump travels across the profile — and where it starts and ends is set by the geometry of the chord. An orbit aligned with the star's equator gives a track symmetric about the line centre; this one, tilted by 30 degrees, runs from -41 to 25 kilometres a second and is not. The measurement is of a path rather than of a centroid, which is why it works on rapidly rotating stars where the velocity anomaly is swamped by the line's own width.

A shadow crossing a rotating line

A transiting planet hides a strip of a rotating star, and that strip has a definite velocity. So the planet removes light from one place in the line profile and leaves a bump there — a bump that travels across the line as the transit proceeds, tracing the path the planet took across the disc.

exoplanets · Spin–orbit alignment The XUV energy that reached one astronomical unit, for three young Suns. The cumulative X-ray and extreme-ultraviolet energy delivered per square metre at the Earth's distance from the Sun, against age, for three histories that differ only in how long the young Sun stayed magnetically saturated: 20 Myr for a slow rotator, 100 Myr for a medium rotator, 300 Myr for a fast rotator. After saturation each declines to a common track by 1 Gyr, as rotation histories are observed to converge. By 4.5 Gyr the totals are 2.06·10¹⁵ J/m² for the slow rotator, 3.66·10¹⁵ J/m² for the medium rotator, 6.47·10¹⁵ J/m² for the fast rotator: the fast rotator delivered 3.1 times as much as the slow rotator, nearly all of it in the first few hundred million years. The Sun's own rotation at that age is not measured; it is inferred from the spread of rotation periods in young clusters, and all three histories are consistent with a Sun that ends up rotating as it does now.

The young Sun's spin decides what the Earth kept

The calculation that strips sub-Neptunes applies just as well to a planet with a trace of hydrogen. An Earth that captured a few hundredths of a per cent of its mass from the gas it formed in — several times the hydrogen now in its oceans — would have lost all of it, or kept most of it, depending on something nobody has measured — how fast the Sun was spinning in its first few hundred million years.

exoplanets · Radius valley The true obliquity a projected angle allows, against the tilt of the star. The true angle ψ between a transiting planet's orbit and its star's spin axis, against the inclination of that spin axis to the line of sight, for projected angles λ of 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, 130° — from cos ψ = sin i★ cos λ for an orbit seen edge-on. At i★ = 90°, a star seen equator-on, the projection loses nothing and ψ = λ. As the star tips towards pole-on the true angle moves towards 90° from whichever side it started, so every curve ends at 90° when i★ = 0. Two things follow exactly. The projected angle is a lower bound for an aligned-looking system and an upper bound for a retrograde-looking one — ψ always lies between λ and 90°. And λ = 90° needs no inclination at all: a planet whose projected orbit crosses the stellar equator at right angles is on a polar orbit whatever the tilt, which is why the pile-up of polar orbits could be seen in projected angles alone.

An angle hidden by the tilt of the star

The line profile of a transited star gives the angle between orbit and spin as projected on the sky. The true angle needs the tilt of the star's spin axis, and every way of measuring that tilt is blind in the same place — a star seen equator-on, which is exactly where an aligned system sits.

exoplanets · Spin–orbit alignment The evidence for a period, one trial period at a time. The natural logarithm of the Bayes factor for a sinusoid at each trial period against no signal, for 120 radial velocities spread over 359 days with 2.0 m/s white noise per point and a planet of semi-amplitude 1.0 m/s at 11.3 days. The amplitude prior is Gaussian with scale 3.0 m/s in each component. At the planet's period the evidence is 14.4 — odds of about 1.8·10⁶ to one — and almost everywhere else it is near zero or negative, because a sinusoid that fits nothing is penalised for the amplitude range it wasted. The quantity that answers the question "is there a planet at some period" is not the peak but the average of the Bayes factor over the prior on the period, here uniform in the logarithm of the period from 1.5 to 1,000 days, and that average is ln B = 7.7: 6.7 lower than the peak, the Bayesian form of the look-elsewhere penalty, paid because the data had to find the period as well as the amplitude.

Odds for a planet that depend on a guess about its size

A false-alarm probability asks how often noise alone would produce a peak this tall. A Bayes factor asks something better — how much more probable the data are with a planet than without one — and pays for it with two numbers nobody measured. The width allowed for the period barely matters. The width allowed for the amplitude can turn strong evidence into none, from the same velocities.

starlight · Periodograms The same two lines, seen as frequencies. The amplitude of the Fourier transform of the two line profiles of the previous comparison, on a logarithmic scale, against frequency in cycles per kilometre per second. At low frequency — the overall width — they agree, as the profiles did. At higher frequency they separate completely: the first star's transform falls to zero at 0.110 cycles per km/s and the second's at 0.132, because the rotation kernel's transform vanishes at 0.660/v sin i and no Gaussian-like broadening has a zero anywhere. The horizontal dashed line marks a noise level of 0.0005 in the transform, which a high signal-to-noise spectrum averaged over several lines reaches; the dip and the side lobe beyond it rise above it for both stars, so the rotation of each is measured by where its transform dips, independent of the macroturbulence. In a noisier spectrum the second star's weaker side lobe would be lost first.

A rotation found where the transform goes dark

A star's rotation and the turbulent flows on its surface both widen its spectral lines, and a profile fitted for one can be refitted for the other with almost no change. Convolution becomes multiplication in Fourier space, though, and the transform of a rotating disc has zeros — frequencies where it is exactly nothing — while the transforms of turbulence and of the spectrograph have none. Where the transform of a line goes dark is a measurement of rotation that turbulence cannot fake.

starlight · Line formation

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Line-broadeningThe Rossiter–McLaughlin effectAsteroseismologyLimb darkeningMacroturbulenceProjected obliquityRadial-velocityAngular momentumBayes factorConvective envelopeConvolutionCore envelope coupling

All concepts